Segment
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Goodyear). Generally, Goodyear summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (60%). But when it comes to comparing Kumho Crugen HP91 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Kumho Crugen HP91 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 66% of Kumho Crugen HP91 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (49%) of the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 also have B wet ratings.
# | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Highly recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | |||
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2 | |||
Show test details |