Segment
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Crugen HP91 vs. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Cooper). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (60%) than Cooper (38%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 66% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport has A rating.
| # | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory2. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Gravel traction
Mud traction
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%
Sand traction
Handling on gravel
Grass traction
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Cooper Zeon 4XS Sport 69 dB
