Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kumho (60%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 235/50 R18 test, where both the Crugen HP91 and the PremiumContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 66% of Kumho Crugen HP91 has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Continental PremiumContact 6 has A rating.
# | Kumho Crugen HP91
| Continental PremiumContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Upper-middle
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kumho Crugen HP91 Satisfactory
1. Kumho Crugen HP91 100%
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Offroad | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Kumho Crugen HP91 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | |||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 2 | 1- | 2 | |||
Show test details |