Segment
2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Kormoran (14%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (86%) of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
Average position in tests
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
Snow traction
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
