Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Firestone Winterhawk 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (65%) than Kormoran (14%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Firestone Winterhawk 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (92%) of the Firestone Winterhawk 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Firestone Winterhawk 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R13 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
1. Kormoran SNOW 95%
Snow braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 100%
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
1. Kormoran SNOW 88%
