Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kormoran SNOW Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kormoran (14%). The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C wet grip rating, whereas 70% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 has B rating.
| # | Kormoran SNOW
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 16.
Worst position in test
2. Kormoran SNOW 38.
Average position in tests
2. Kormoran SNOW 30.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
2. Kormoran SNOW 55%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
2. Kormoran SNOW 68%
Wet braking
1. Kormoran SNOW 67%
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
2. Kormoran SNOW 73%
