• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kormoran SNOW vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 7% of the Kormoran SNOW. The first tyre test of Kormoran SNOW was done in 2021, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the SNOW and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran SNOW has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B rating.

# Kormoran SNOW
/7%
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
/84%

Add to comparison

Kormoran
BFGoodrich
DimensionsR15 - R18 R14 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34.628.9
Kormoran Snow41.5-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 237.529.4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,8
Kormoran Snow38,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,825,4
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test32,1
Kormoran Snow39,1
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 235,627,9
Show test details