Segment
1. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle2. Kormoran Road Performance Lowcost
Comparison: Kormoran Road Performance vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Kormoran) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Kormoran is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nokian summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Kormoran (14%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 74% compared to 14% of the Kormoran Road Performance. The first tyre test of Kormoran Road Performance was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Nokian WetProof first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Road Performance and the WetProof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kormoran Road Performance has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
| # | Kormoran Road Performance
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Kormoran Road Performance Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
| Kormoran Road Performance Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,7 | 3,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 1,2 | |
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
