14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kleber Quadraxer 3 vs. Continental AllSeasonContact 2

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	Kleber Quadraxer 3 /87%	Continental AllSeasonContact 2 /85%

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R15 - R21
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

In this review, we will be comparing two popular all-round tyres - the Kleber Quadraxer 3 made in Poland and the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 made in Czech Republic. Both have been tested by reputable automotive magazines such as Autobild and have been well-received for their performance, despite their different strengths and weaknesses.

The Kleber Quadraxer 3, a replacement for the Kleber Quadraxer 2, is a tyre that excels in comfort, exterior noise, snow cornering and snow traction. Despite scoring a commendable 87% rating in our tests, it has shown a delayed response in steering and understeer in wet handling. In the AUTOBILD test, it secured the 7th place out of 37 tyres with its best features being its comfort and snow performance. However, in Autobild 2023 and 2024, its delayed steering response and subpar wet handling were noted as areas for improvement. Kleber has certainly made significant improvements from their previous models while keeping a focus on specific strong features.

In contrast, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has a slightly lower rating of 85% in our tests. Still, it showed an impressive performance in exterior noise suppression, rolling resistance, snow handling, and wet driving conditions. This model particularly stood out for its snow and wet performance in all tests, securing a 3rd place out of 37 tyres in the AUTOBILD test and a 2nd place out of 16 tyres in another Autobild test. Despite this, it has average resistance to aquaplaning and a higher price point, as observed in Autobild 2024. Despite not having a specific tyre to replace, Continental has forged a reputable position with this all-around performer.

In conclusion, the Kleber Quadraxer 3 performs exceptionally well in comfort and snowy conditions with room for improvement in wet handling. The Continental AllSeasonContact 2, on the other hand, stands as an all-rounded performer with great snow and wet handling, although its resistance to aquaplaning could be better. With only a 2% difference in our ratings, the choice between these two would largely depend on one's driving conditions and preference for comfort or overall performance.

Segment

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Premium

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 247

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 109

Number of tests

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 6x

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 4x

Best position in test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 1.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 4.

Worst position in test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 5.

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 8.

Average position in tests

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 3

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 5.33

Year of the last test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 2024

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 2024

Best rating in test

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Highly recommended

Worst rating in test

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 Good

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

78%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 78%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 66%

Wet braking

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 85%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 60%

Wet handling

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 88%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 58%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 81%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 68%

Wet circle cornering

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 83%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 67%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

85%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

84%

Snow traction

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 88%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 85%

Snow braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 82%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 77%

Snow handling

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 85%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 81%

Snow cornering

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 92%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 88%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

80%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

80%

Comfort

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 79%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 74%

Exterior noise

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 87%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 82%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 ?

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

74%

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 82%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 78%

Mileage

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 80%

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 63%

Price/value

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 69%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 61%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 B

2. Kleber Quadraxer 3 ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
Quadraxer 3

81%

Continental
AllSeasonContact 2

68%

Dry handling

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 78%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 64%

Dry braking

1. Kleber Quadraxer 3 84%

2. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 71%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Allyear tyre test 2024 225/50 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	2+	2+
Kleber Quadraxer 3 Rating: Good	dobré	2	2-	2+	3+
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	2+	2	2+	3+
Show test details