Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kleber (73%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 84% compared to 69% of the Kleber KRISALP HP3. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the KRISALP HP3 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

#	Kleber KRISALP HP3 /69%	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R14 - R20	R14 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Kleber KRISALP HP3

/69%

BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

/84%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R14 - R20

R14 - R19

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Number of sizes available

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 107

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 2023

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Wet

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

76%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 83%

Wet braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 65%

Wet handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 88%

Wet circle cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 69%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

81%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Exterior noise

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

Comfort

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

87%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

85%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 81%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 91%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 85%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 86%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 83%

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

70%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

68%

Dry braking

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 71%

Dry handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 67%

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

71%

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

71%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

Price/value

1. Kleber KRISALP HP3 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Kleber KRISALP HP3 ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Kleber
KRISALP HP3

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber Krisalp HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	2	2
Show test details

AUTOBILD Winter tyre test 2024 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	34.6	28.9
Kleber Krisalp HP3	37.8	29.3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	37.5	29.4
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2023 205/60 R16

Name	Enviromental impact	Driving safety
Best values in test	2	2.1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2.4	2.7
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2023 225/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	31,4	29,2
Kleber Krisalp HP3	35,1	29,3
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,2	29,3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,8	25,4
Kleber KRISALP HP3	37,3	25,5
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,8	25,4
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2022 215/55 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	2+	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2-	2-	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2-	2	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2-	2	2+	3+	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2	3+	1-	3+	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,6	28,4
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,6	27,9
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	1-	2+	1-
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Exemplary	2	2	2+	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Satisfactory	2+	3+	1-	2-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
Kleber KRISALP HP3 Rating: Good	2	2-	1-	2
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
Kleber KRISALP HP3	35,7	26,7
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Show test details

Comparison: Kleber KRISALP HP3 vs. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands