Segment
1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Premium2. Kleber Krisalp HP2 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kleber Krisalp HP2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Kleber) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Kleber is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kleber (73%). But when it comes to comparing Kleber Krisalp HP2 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Krisalp HP2 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Kleber Krisalp HP2
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R14 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Příkladné | 1- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 3+ | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 38,9 | 26,4 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 38,5 | 25,9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Dobré | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 1 | 1,5 |
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | Nedostatečné | 4,6 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,7 | 4,4 | 1,5 | 2,0 |
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,6 | 1,9 | 2,9 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | ||||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3 | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 1- | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kleber Krisalp HP2 | 42,9 | 28,7 | |||||
| Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 | 43,4 | 28,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
