Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
# | Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Maxxis Victra Sport 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The comparison between the Kleber Dynaxer UHP tyre and the Maxxis Victra Sport 5 tyre provides an in-depth assessment of the tyres' performance, rating, and features. These two models, manufactured by Kleber and Maxxis respectively, have undergone extensive testing by experts to provide potential buyers with a clearer understanding of their strengths and weaknesses.
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP, a summer tyre, boasts an array of features that have earned it a 48% rating from our team. It shines particularly in exterior noise, ranked 13th in a pool of 50 tyres tested by Autobild, making it a relatively comfortable and quiet tyre. However, according to Autobild 2023 tests, the tyre's grip and lateral guidance in wet conditions leave room for improvement, showing moderate capabilities, coupled with low aquaplaning reserves.The overall verdict suggests a high mileage, quiet rolling, and low rolling resistance as its strengths while a need for better aquatic properties is its weakness.
The Maxxis Victra Sport 5, identified under the subtype UHP and manufactured in CN, outperforms the Kleber tyre with a 69% rating. Standing 20th in the Autobild tests against 50 contenders indicates a strong overall performance. The tyre shines with excellent aquaplaning safety reserves and nas handling, per Autobild 2023 tests. This translates to a strengthened safety net in wet conditions. However, the tyre scores average in terms of longevity and exhibits delayed steering response. Nevertheless, the superior safety features and handling in wet conditions outweigh its minor setbacks.
Based on their individual features and Autobild's comparative tests, Maxxis Victra Sport 5 narrowly outperforms the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, particularly in terms of wet handling and safety reserves against aquaplaning. Despite the strong competition, both these tyres offer unique characteristics that cater to a range of customer needs and preferences.
It is essential to note that neither of these models have been replaced by newer models, which means these are currently the best offerings from their respective manufacturers.
In conclusion, the choice between these two tyres would come down to personal preferences and primary usage requirements as both tyres display commendable features, with just minor setbacks.
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Lowcost
1. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Highly recommended2. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory2. Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | vynikající | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2 | |||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2+ | 2 | 3+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 60.8 | 26.7 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 1- | 1 | |||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | 2 | |||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 Rating: Conditionally recommended | podmíněně doporučeno | 2 | 2+ | 3- | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
Maxxis Victra Sport 5 | 34,8 | 33,4 | |||||
Show test details |