Segment
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein). Generally, Vredestein winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kenda (9%). The first tyre test of Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Vredestein Wintrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2024 215/55 R17 test, where both the Wintergen 2 KR501 and the Wintrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501
| Vredestein Wintrac Pro
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Premium2. Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Lowcost
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Exemplary
1. Vredestein Wintrac Pro Recommended
Name | Rating | Winter | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1.7 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 1.6 | 1.3 |
Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 4.4 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 2.5 |
Vredestein Wintrac Pro Rating: Good | dobré | 2.4 | 2.4 | 2.2 | 2.3 | 2.9 | 2.0 | 2.1 |
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 40,9 | - | |||||
Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,4 | 30,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 41,1 | ||||||
Vredestein Wintrac Pro | 36,9 | 26,3 | |||||
Show test details |