Segment
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kenda (9%). The first tyre test of Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Wintergen 2 KR501 and the G-FORCE WINTER 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501
| BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R19 | R14 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle2. Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 Lowcost
1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 43.7 | - | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 37.5 | 29.4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 31,4 | 29,2 | |||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 40,9 | - | |||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,2 | 29,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Kenda Wintergen 2 KR501 | 41,1 | ||||||
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 | 35,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Show test details |