Segment
1. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost2. Tomket Sport Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from China (Tomket). Generally, Kenda summer tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Tomket (11%). In this particular case, the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 has a better rating of 63% compared to 11% of the Tomket Sport. The first tyre test of Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 was done in 2023, compared to 2021 when was the Tomket Sport first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Kenetica Pro KR210 and the Sport were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
| Tomket Sport
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R16 | ||
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost2. Tomket Sport Lowcost
2. Tomket Sport 16.
2. Tomket Sport 49.
2. Tomket Sport Sufficient
2. Tomket Sport Sufficient
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | 38,6 | 31,2 | |||||
Tomket Sport | 38,6 | 33,3 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | chvalitebné | 3,0 | 2,4 | ||||
Tomket Sport Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,3 | 3,8 | ||||
Show test details |