Segment
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Premium2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin allround tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than Kenda (1%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Kenetica 4S SUV and the CrossClimate 2 SUV were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Test winner
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow traction
Snow handling
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Michelin CrossClimate 2 SUV Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
