Segment
2. Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Lowcost
Comparison: Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV vs. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone allround tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Kenda (1%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 235/65 R17 test, where both the Kenetica 4S SUV and the Turanza All Season 6 were tested.
| # | Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kenda Kenetica 4S SUV Rating: Not recommended | |||||||
| Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 Rating: Test winner | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
