Segment
1. Infinity Ecosis Lowcost2. Fulda EcoControl HP Lowcost
Comparison: Infinity Ecosis vs. Fulda EcoControl HP
Table of contents:
| # | Infinity Ecosis
| Fulda EcoControl HP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R14 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the world of summer tyres, the Infinity Ecosis and Fulda EcoControl HP are two remarkable models that have undergone various tests to ascertain their performance. This comparison provides a concise outline of the data derived from these tests, revealing the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre while also stating which one fares better overall.
Starting off with the Infinity Ecosis tyre, which has not been replaced by a newer model, its performance has been found to be of a good standard, evident from our rating of 34%. The tyre's standout features are its exterior noise production, which was low enough for notable mention. However, according to Autobild’s test, the Infinity Ecosis didn't perform as well as other tyres, securing only the 12th position out of 51 tyres tested. Even in the ADAC test, the Infinity Ecosis came in at 15th place out of 16 tyres, indicating that it has room for improvements.
On the other hand, we have the Fulda EcoControl HP tyre, which has quite interestingly been succeeded by Fulda EcoControl HP2. The tyre’s prime features include its impressive mileage and cost-effectiveness – valuable qualities for drivers looking for durability and significant cost savings. Garnering our rating of 45%, it did outperform the Infinity Ecosis in both Autobild’s and ADAC's tests, ranking 17th out of 51 and 10th out of 16 respectively. This statistically proves the superiority of Fulda EcoControl HP over Infinity Ecosis, making it a worthy choice for those wanting an upgrade in performance.
As for the manufacturers of these tyres, Infinity is known for producing quality tyres that fit various driving needs, while Fulda has consistently prioritised safety and sustainability, creating tyres that are eco-friendly without compromising on performance.
Conclusion: The data underlines the fact that the Fulda EcoControl HP tyre outshines the Infinity Ecosis tyre in overall test evaluations. Despite this, the strengths and weaknesses found in each tyre may appeal to different drivers, especially those prioritizing noise reduction or seeking cost-effective long-distance travel. Assess your needs and use this comparison to pick the tyre that works best for you, your vehicle, and your driving style.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Infinity Ecosis 12.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Infinity Ecosis Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda EcoControl HP Recommended2. Infinity Ecosis Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 2+ | 1- | 1 | |||
| Infinity Ecosis Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2 | 2- | |||
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Good | dobré | 2- | 2+ | 1 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,5 | 34,3 | |||||
| Infinity Ecosis | 38,1 | 37 | |||||
| Fulda EcoControl HP | 37 | 39,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 3,0 | 1,0 | 1,7 | |
| Infinity Ecosis Rating: Sufficient | dostatečné | 3,2 | 3,1 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,0 | |
| Fulda EcoControl HP Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,9 | 2,6 | 3,4 | 1,5 | 2,2 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
