Segment
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Imperial (7%). The first tyre test of Imperial SnowDragon UHP was done in 2020, compared to 2019 when was the Michelin ALPIN 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the SnowDragon UHP and the ALPIN 6 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Imperial SnowDragon UHP
| Michelin ALPIN 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R16 - R21 | R15 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Premium2. Imperial SnowDragon UHP Lowcost
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 4.33
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Exemplary
1. Michelin ALPIN 6 Good
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | ||||||
Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 39,1 | ||||||
Michelin Alpin 6 | 34,1 | 26,4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Rolling resistance | Noise | Wear |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | dobré | 1,7 | 1,9 | 1,8 | 1,9 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 1,5 |
Imperial SnowDragon UHP Rating: Poor | nedostatečné | 5,3 | 2,1 | 4,0 | 2,3 | 2,3 | 2,9 | 1,5 |
Michelin Alpin 6 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,6 | 2,0 |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 101,1 | 103,4 | 102,8 | 100 | |||
Imperial SnowDragon UHP | 92,1 | 86,9 | 99,2 | 90,2 | |||
Michelin Alpin 6 | 98,66 | 97,4 | 99,2 | 99,4 | |||
Show test details |