Segment
1. Imperial Snowdragon HP Lowcost2. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Radar). Generally, Radar winter tyres are slightly better rated (48%) than Imperial (7%). The first tyre test of Imperial Snowdragon HP was done in 2018, compared to 2020 when was the Radar Dimax Alpine first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowdragon HP and the Dimax Alpine were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Imperial Snowdragon HP
| Radar Dimax Alpine
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Imperial Snowdragon HP Lowcost2. Radar Dimax Alpine Lowcost
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Imperial Snowdragon HP | 44.5 | - | |||||
Radar Dimax Alpine | 39.9 | 28.9 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
Imperial Snowdragon HP | 41,1 | ||||||
Radar Dimax Alpine | 37,7 | 28,6 | |||||
Show test details |