Segment
2. Imperial Snowdragon HP Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Imperial (7%). The first tyre test of Imperial Snowdragon HP was done in 2018, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowdragon HP and the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Imperial Snowdragon HP
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R12 - R20 | R13 - R17 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Imperial Snowdragon HP Lowcost
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | ||||||
Imperial Snowdragon HP | 41,1 | ||||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 33,4 | 28,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,3 | 27 | |||||
Imperial Snowdragon HP | 39,8 | - | |||||
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 | 34,9 | 27,7 | |||||
Show test details |