Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle2. Imperial Snowdragon 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial Snowdragon 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Imperial) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho winter tyres are slightly better rated (38%) than Imperial (7%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Snowdragon 2 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | Imperial Snowdragon 2
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 2 | 46,8 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 41,0 | - | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Imperial Snowdragon 2 | 50,6 | - | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||