Segment
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Upper-middle2. Imperial EcoSport 2 Lowcost
Comparison: Imperial EcoSport 2 vs. Kleber Dynaxer UHP
Table of contents:
| # | Imperial EcoSport 2
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Comparing two summer tyres, the Imperial EcoSport 2 and the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, we find a notable difference between the performances of the two models.
The Imperial EcoSport 2, a product of Imperial, did not have a previous model and was not replaced by a newer model either. Moreover, we currently do not hold a rating for this tyre, suggesting that it may need more extensive testing for a more comprehensive assessment.
On the other hand, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP, manufactured by Kleber, boasts a substantial 48% rating on our scale. Similar to its counterpart, this tyre neither has a predecessor nor a successor model. However, the results from the mutual tests suggest that this tyre presents a superior performance to the Imperial EcoSport 2.
Mutual Test Positions
In the Autobild test, the Imperial EcoSport 2 fell short, securing 41st position out of 53 tyres. Conversely, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP placed significantly better, ranking 15th and particularly excelling in terms of Exterior Noise. This clearly indicates the overall superior performance of the Kleber Dynaxer UHP over the Imperial EcoSport 2.
Strengths and Weaknesses
The Kleber Dynaxer UHP proved excellent in terms of mileage and noise levels, providing a quiet and smooth ride experience. Furthermore, it also demonstrated low rolling resistance which implies fuel efficiency. Conversely, the tyre did show some weaknesses, including moderate grip and low lateral support in wet conditions, as well as reduced aquaplaning reserves. This tyre thus requires caution during rainy weather. As for the Imperial EcoSport 2, due to lack of sufficient data, it's hard to comment on its strengths or weaknesses at this point.
Verdict
Based on the available data, the Kleber Dynaxer UHP outperforms the Imperial EcoSport 2 in terms of test performance and overall rating. However, the specific strengths and weaknesses of these tyres should be carefully considered according to the personal requirements and the environmental conditions in which they will be used.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Imperial EcoSport 2 45.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kleber Dynaxer UHP Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Imperial EcoSport 2 | 72.3 | 31.7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 64.5 | 28 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,3 | 38,7 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 34,1 | 32,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Imperial Ecosport 2 | 37,1 | 37,2 | |||||
| Kleber Dynaxer UHP | 35,9 | 32,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
