Segment
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle2. Hifly All-Turi 221 Lowcost
Comparison: Hifly All-Turi 221 vs. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hifly) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho allround tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Hifly (1%). The first tyre test of Hifly All-Turi 221 was done in 2023, compared to 2020 when was the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the All-Turi 221 and the HA32 Solus 4S were tested.
| # | Hifly All-Turi 221
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R17 | R13 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
| Hifly All-Turi 221 | 45.3 | 55.6 | |||||
| Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
