Segment
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hi Fly HF 805 vs. Falken Azenis FK510
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Hi) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Falken summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Hi (14%). The first tyre test of Hi Fly HF 805 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Falken Azenis FK510 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Fly HF 805 and the Azenis FK510 were tested.
| # | Hi Fly HF 805
| Falken Azenis FK510
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R19 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Worst position in test
2. Hi Fly HF 805 29.
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Falken Azenis FK510 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Hi Fly HF 805 | 37,5 | 40,9 | |||||
| Falken Azenis FK510 | 35,5 | 34,8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
