14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has a better rating of 87% compared to 72% of the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 205/55 R16 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made in Korea and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /72%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /87%

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

87%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

78%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

86%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

82%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

Snow braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 95%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

Snow cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 56%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

92%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

87%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 96%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 87%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 89%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 85%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 C

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

84%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

79%

Exterior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

Interior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 92%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 75%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

74%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

70%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 63%

Mileage

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 67%

Price/value

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 76%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

81%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452

79%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Rolling resistance	Wear
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+	1
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	dobré	1-	2	1-	2	2+
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	dobré	1-	2	1	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2021 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,1	27,3
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	33,4	28,2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	32,1	28,1
Show test details

Használtautó.hu Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on ice
Best values in test	13,9	14,8	16,4
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	14,6	15,8	22
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	15,4	16,4	21,7
Show test details

Autoexpress Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Points total	Winter	Wet	Dry	Rolling resistance	Noise
Best values in test	101,6	299,9	299,9	100	101,1	100,7
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	99,3	294,4	297,6	96,2	79,6	98,1
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	100	285,8	299,8	100	87,6	99,8
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2020 205/55 R16

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	dobré	1,3	2,0	1,8	2,1	2,5	1,0	1,8
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	dobré	2,0	2,5	2,1	2,4	3,2	2,0	1,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Good	dobré	1,3	2,1	2,1	2,4	2,9	2,5	2,0
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Rating	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	příkladné	2+	2+	1	2+
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Good*	dobré	2-	2-	1	2
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Exemplary	příkladné	1-	2	2	2
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	29,2	24
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452	32	24,9
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005	29,2	24,6
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands