Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 vs. Fulda Kristall Montero 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Fulda (42%). Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the Kristall Montero 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Fulda Kristall Montero 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 | 42,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 1 | ||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Rating: - | Doporučitelné | 2- | 2 | 2+ | 1 | ||
| Fulda Kristall Montero 3 Rating: - | Uspokojivé | 3+ | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
