Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has a better rating of 72% compared to 26% of the Nokian WR SUV 4. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A was done in 2021, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 235/55 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A and the WR SUV 4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B wet grip rating, whereas 89% of Nokian WR SUV 4 has C rating.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Rating: Good | dobré | 2+ | 2- | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2- | 2- | 2+ | 2- | 2 | |
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 386 | 143 | 138 | 118 | |||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A | 327 | 83 | 128 | 116 | |||
Nokian WR SUV 4 | 347 | 107 | 133 | 107 | |||
Show test details |