Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A has B wet grip rating, whereas 80% of Nokian WR SUV 3 has C rating.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo3 X W330A Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 100%