Segment
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has a better rating of 51% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 was done in 2015, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating. We also know where Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made - Hungary.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB