• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (80%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 has a better rating of 59% compared to 51% of the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 255/35 R19 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and the Pilot Alpin PA4 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (91%) of the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4 also have C wet ratings. We also know where Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made - Hungary.

# Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
/51%
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
/59%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR15 - R22 R17 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-21-
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: Good
22- 2+
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Good
22 2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-2+2+
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: Satisfactory
2-2-2
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Exemplary
2+21-
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in test9,69,29,910
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: Still recommended
6,88,38,17,3
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Recommended
7,78,18,47,2
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test221-
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: Satisfactory
32 2
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: Satisfactory
3+2- 2+
Show test details
Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test1-21-
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320
Rating: -
3+2 2+
Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4
Rating: -
22- 1-
Show test details