14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 was done in 2015, compared to 2019 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Automotorsport 2019 215/55 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 and the Blizzak LM-005 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 86% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 has A rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary and Blizzak LM-005 is made in Italy/Hungary/Poland.

#	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 /0%	Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 /87%

Dimensions	R15 - R22	R14 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Premium

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Premium

Number of sizes available

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 213

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 124

Number of tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 47x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 9x

Best position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 5.

Worst position in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 15.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 20.

Average position in tests

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 3.21

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 7.44

Year of the last test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 2024

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 2019

Best rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Very good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Conditionally recommended

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

83%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

83%

Dry braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 81%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

Dry handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

Dry steering response

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 90%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

Dry driving behavior

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 78%

Dry lane changing

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 80%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 80%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

89%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

73%

Wet braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 95%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 76%

Wet circle cornering

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 90%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 79%

Wet handling

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 93%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 73%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 A

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 C

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

88%

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

78%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 88%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Snow braking

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 86%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

Snow handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 85%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 72%

Snow cornering

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 87%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 77%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

82%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

75%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

Interior noise

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 56%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 ?

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

68%

Rolling resistance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 87%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Fuel efficiency

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 74%

Mileage

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 64%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 64%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 C

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Ice braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

2. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 79%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 82%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 78%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Automotorsport Winter tyre test 2019 215/55 R17

Name	Points total	Rating
Best values in test	8,9	velmi dobré
Hankook Winter icept evo2 W320 Rating: Good*	7,6	dobré
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 Rating: Very good	8,8	velmi dobré
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands