Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 3 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A vs. Nokian WR SUV 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A and Nokian WR SUV 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian WR SUV 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 255/55 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A and the WR SUV 3 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (80%) of the Nokian WR SUV 3 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A
| Nokian WR SUV 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R23 | R15 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 4.25
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR SUV 3 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A Rating: - | Dobré | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Nokian WR SUV 3 Rating: - | Dostatečné | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||