Segment
2. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A vs. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than Hankook (78%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A and Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 255/55 R18 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A and the Latitude Alpin LA2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 88% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R23 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Test winner
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | Příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320A Rating: - | Dobré | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
| Michelin Latitude Alpin LA2 Rating: - | Dobré | 2 | 2- | 2+ | |||
| Show test details | |||||||