Segment
2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Yokohama (46%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and Yokohama BluEarth winter V905, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended2. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
