Segment
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2020 255/55 R19 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.
# | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
| Nokian WR SUV 4
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR SUV 4 Upper-middle
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Test winner2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Recommended
1. Nokian WR SUV 4 Good2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Still recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | velmi doporučeno | 1 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | ||
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 3 | 3+ | 1 | 1- | ||
Nokian WR SUV 4 Rating: Highly recommended | velmi doporučeno | 2- | 1- | 1- | 1- | ||
Show test details |