• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 vs. Nokian WR SUV 4

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Nokian (52%). The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Nokian WR SUV 4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Offroad 2020 255/55 R19 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and the WR SUV 4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (89%) of the Nokian WR SUV 4 also have C wet ratings.

# Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
/0%
Nokian WR SUV 4
/26%

Add to comparison

Hankook
Nokian
DimensionsR16 - R18 R16 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Offroad
Name RatingWetDrySnowIce
Best values in testvelmi doporučeno12+12+
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
Rating: Recommended
doporučeno33+1 1-
Nokian WR SUV 4
Rating: Highly recommended
velmi doporučeno 2-1-1-1-
Show test details