• 12 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Bridgestone (75%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AutoMotorSport 2016 215/60 R17 test, where both the Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 and the Blizzak LM-80 Evo were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo also have C wet ratings.

# Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
/0%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
/0%

Add to comparison

Hankook
Bridgestone
DimensionsR16 - R18 R15 - R20
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

AutoMotorSport
Name RatingWetDrySnowEnviromental impact
Best values in testvelmi doporučeno9,89,39,59,1
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 SUV W320
Rating: Still recommended
částečně doporučeno7,48,08,57,3
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-80 Evo
Rating: Still recommended
částečně doporučeno5,77,99,5 7,9
Show test details