Segment
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 has a better rating of 78% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2022 215/55 R17 test, where both the W462 Winter i*cept RS3 and the WR Snowproof P were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R17 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
1. Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Highly recommended2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,8 | 25,4 | |||||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 | 35,3 | 26,6 | |||||
Nokian WR Snowproof P | 36 | 26,2 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | 2+ | |||
Hankook W462 Winter i*cept RS3 Rating: Good | 2+ | 2 | 2 | 3+ | |||
Nokian WR Snowproof P Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | 2- | 2 | |||
Show test details |