In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 has a better rating of 82% compared to 74% of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2021 265/35 R20 test, where both the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Pilot Sport 4 S were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 87% of Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (64%) of the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus S1 evo3 K127 is made in Korea and Pilot Sport 4 S is made in United States.
# | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
| Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R23 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | |||||
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Good | 2 | 2 | |||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended | |||||||
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S Rating: - | |||||||
Show test details |