Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1-evo Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1-evo vs. Bridgestone Potenza S001
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Hankook (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus S1-evo and Bridgestone Potenza S001, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus S1-evo was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ventus S1-evo and the Potenza S001 were tested.
| # | Hankook Ventus S1-evo
| Bridgestone Potenza S001
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R20 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1-evo Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1-evo Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 2 | 2+ | ||||
| Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 3+ | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
