Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Yokohama (42%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A and Yokohama BluEarth winter V905, the rating is the same - 0%. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A
| Yokohama BluEarth winter V905
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory
