Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A vs. Nokian WR Snowproof
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (66%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A has C wet grip rating, whereas 86% of Nokian WR Snowproof has B rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 SUV K125A
| Nokian WR Snowproof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R18 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WR Snowproof 11.07
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof Satisfactory
