Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 72% compared to 32% of the Nokian zLine SUV. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the zLine SUV were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine SUV also have A wet ratings. We also know where Ventus Prime3 K125 is made - Hungary.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Nokian zLine SUV | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R17 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian zLine SUV Upper-middle
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory
1. Nokian zLine SUV Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
2. Nokian zLine SUV ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 1- | 1 | ||||
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 2+ | 2 | ||||
Nokian zLine SUV Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 3+ | ||||
Show test details |