Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (78%) than Hankook (71%). In this particular case, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 has a better rating of 75% compared to 53% of the Continental EcoContact 6. The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 was done in 2016, compared to 2020 when was the Continental EcoContact 6 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2020 235/55 R17 test, where both the Ventus Prime3 K125 and the EcoContact 6 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 76% of Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (60%) of the Continental EcoContact 6 also have A wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the Ventus Prime3 K125 is made in Hungary and EcoContact 6 is made in Germany.
# | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Continental EcoContact 6
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R13 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Continental EcoContact 6 Premium
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory
1. Continental EcoContact 6 Satisfactory2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | doporučeno | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,4 | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,0 | 2,0 | |
Continental EcoContact 6 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,0 | 2,3 | 1,0 | 1,2 | |
Show test details |