Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime 4
| Kumho Ecsta HS52
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R20 | R14 - R18 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
When it comes to road performance, tyres play a crucial role. For this reason, we'd like to compare two leading tyre manufacturers, Hankook and Kumho, focusing on their models - Hankook Ventus Prime 4 and Kumho Ecsta HS52. Note, Ventus Prime 4 replaced the previous model, Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and Ecsta HS52 succeeded Kumho Ecsta HS51.
Let's break down the performances based on different aspects:
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 excelled impressively in tests. The tyre ranked 2nd out of 51 in Autobild tests with top performances in Dry Braking and Wet Braking. On a similar note, the Ventus Prime 4 also starred in Vibilagare tests, achieving a notable 6th position out of 9. However, the tyre did exhibit weaker performance areas, notably in aquaplaning resistance and external noise.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 also demonstrated strong prowess in the same test categories, finishing 3rd in both Autobild and Vibilagare tests. Nonetheless, some weaknesses were noted in the tyre's aquaplaning behaviour and weight.
In summary, the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 offers dynamic handling performance in both wet and dry conditions, reinforced by the short braking distances and relatively low rolling resistance. However, the tyre tends to wear out faster, which could be a weak point for users prioritising longevity.
The Kumho Ecsta HS52 also offers balanced performance, with secure handling on both wet and dry roads, excellent projected mileage, and lower fuel consumption. Nevertheless, the tyre may not perform as efficiently in aquaplaning situations due to its weight.
In general, both tyres are good performers and come with their unique strengths and weaknesses. Users could choose between the two, keeping their specific driving conditions and preferences in mind. For more information, please visit the Hankook and Kumho manufacturer pages for more insights.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 5.67
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta HS52 Good2. Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Offroad
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Points total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 87 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 77 | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 84 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,9 | 27,7 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,4 | 26,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,6 | 1,7 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,1 | 2,9 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,8 | 2,1 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 104,7 | 106 | 103,4 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 101 | 100,6 | 101,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 96,9 | 94,3 | 99,5 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | vítěz testu | 1 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 1 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Recommended | doporučeno | 1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 1,3 | 1,8 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,4 | ||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,7 | 2,3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Running costs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | příkladné | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 Rating: Exemplary | příkladné | 1- | 2+ | 2+ | |||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 Rating: Good | dobré | 2 | 2 | 2 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime 4 | 35,8 | 27,8 | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta HS52 | 35,7 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
