Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Premium2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Lowcost
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Laufenn). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Laufenn (58%). The first tyre test of Hankook Ventus Evo was done in 2025, compared to 2021 when was the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2025 225/40 R18 test, where both the Ventus Evo and the S Fit EQ+ LK01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Hankook Ventus Evo has A wet grip rating, whereas 97% of Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 has B rating.
| # | Hankook Ventus Evo
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Evo Exemplary2. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking according to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Evo | 34.0 | 27.4 | |||||
| Laufenn S Fit EQ+ LK01 | 34.9 | 29.7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
