Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (66%). In this particular case, the Nokian WetProof has a better rating of 74% compared to 48% of the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2021 195/55 R16 test, where both the Kinergy eco2 K435 and the WetProof were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WetProof has A rating.
# | Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R17 | R14 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
1. Nokian WetProof 5.64
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Satisfactory
Name | Points total | Rating | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 8,9 | dobré | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | |
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 Rating: Satisfactory | 7,7 | uspokojivé | 6,9 | 7,4 | 10 | 10 | |
Nokian WetProof Rating: Good | 8,2 | dobré | 8,5 | 7,6 | 7 | 10 | |
Show test details |