• 14 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 vs. Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Falken). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Falken (70%). In this particular case, the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun has a better rating of 75% compared to 48% of the Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435. The first tyre test of Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Firmenauto 2021 195/55 R16 test, where both the Kinergy eco2 K435 and the ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 69% of Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (70%) of the Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun also have B wet ratings.

# Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
/48%
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
/75%

Add to comparison

Hankook
Falken
DimensionsR13 - R17 R14 - R22
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Firmenauto
Name Points totalRatingWetDryRolling resistanceNoise
Best values in test8,9dobré8,98,71010
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
Rating: Satisfactory
7,7uspokojivé6,97,410 10
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
7,0uspokojivé7,86,937
Show test details
ADAC
Name RatingWetDryNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in testdobré1,91,52,10,51,4
Hankook Kinergy eco2 K435
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé3,42,42,42,51,7
Falken ZIEX ZE310 Ecorun
Rating: Satisfactory
uspokojivé3,01,82,81,52,2
Show test details