Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Nokian Line Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Nokian Line
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Nokian (66%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Nokian Line, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Line were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 55% of Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian Line has A rating.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Nokian Line
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
2. Nokian Line 17.
Average position in tests
2. Nokian Line 12.17
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian Line Good
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | |
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Nokian Line Rating: Good | dobré | 2,3 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,6 | 1,8 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
