Segment
1. Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Premium2. Michelin Energy Saver + Premium
Comparison: Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 vs. Michelin Energy Saver +
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Hankook (71%). But when it comes to comparing Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 and Michelin Energy Saver +, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2016 185/65 R15 test, where both the Kinergy Eco K425 and the Energy Saver + were tested.
| # | Hankook Kinergy Eco K425
| Michelin Energy Saver +
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R16 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Energy Saver + Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Michelin Energy Saver + Satisfactory
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Rating | Wet | Dry | Wear | Comfort | Fuel consumption | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | dobré | 2,0 | 1,6 | 1,0 | 1,7 | 1,6 | |
| Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Rating: Good | dobré | 2,2 | 1,7 | 2,5 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |
| Michelin Energy Saver + Rating: Satisfactory | uspokojivé | 2,8 | 2,1 | 1,0 | 3,5 | 1,6 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
